Agronomic parameters and drought tolerance indices of bread wheat genotypes as influenced by well-watered and water deficit conditions
Background A primary threat to food security stems from the expanding global population and climate change, which have increased the frequency of droughts. Owing to shifting climatic conditions, abiotic stresses such as severe drought are intensifying, reducing wheat productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the response of elite drought-tolerant wheat genotypes to water deficit stress by analysing agronomic and physio-biochemical traits, with the goal of identifying promising genotypes for breeding. Methods Twenty wheat genotypes sourced from various national and international drought-tolerant nurseries, including a benchmark variety, were tested under water deficit and well-watered conditions over two consecutive years. The data collected included agronomic traits such as plant height (PH), days to heading (DH), days to anthesis (DA), days to physiological maturity (DPM), canopy temperature, SPAD values at different growth stages, intercepted photosynthetically active radiation above the canopy (IPARAC) and on the ground (IPAR OG), yield stability index (YSI), stress tolerance index (STI), stress index (SI), leaf area index (LAI), spike length (SL), grains per spike (GPS), 1000-grain weight (TSW), grain yield (GY; t/ha), and biomass yield (BY; t/ha). Results To streamline the study, two years of aggregated data were analysed for each parameter. Drought tolerance was assessed based on grain yield, and multitrait genotype‒ideotype distance (MGIDI) indices were employed to select drought-tolerant wheat genotypes. Significant differences were observed among the wheat genotypes across all measured parameters under both conditions. Under normal conditions, correlation analysis revealed that grain yield (GY) and biomass yield (BY) had the strongest positive relationship (r = 0.75**), followed by TSW, LAI, GPS, SL, PH, DPM, and DA. In contrast, under water deficit stress, BY exhibited a notable correlation with plant height (PH) (r = 0.42). Under both irrigated and water
Background A primary threat to food security stems from the expanding global population and climate change, which have increased the frequency of droughts. Owing to shifting climatic conditions, abiotic stresses such as severe drought are intensifying, reducing wheat productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the response of elite drought-tolerant wheat genotypes to water deficit stress by analysing agronomic and physio-biochemical traits, with the goal of identifying promising genotypes for breeding. Methods Twenty wheat genotypes sourced from various national and international drought-tolerant nurseries, including a benchmark variety, were tested under water deficit and well-watered conditions over two consecutive years. The data collected included agronomic traits such as plant height (PH), days to heading (DH), days to anthesis (DA), days to physiological maturity (DPM), canopy temperature, SPAD values at different growth stages, intercepted photosynthetically active radiation above the canopy (IPARAC) and on the ground (IPAR OG), yield stability index (YSI), stress tolerance index (STI), stress index (SI), leaf area index (LAI), spike length (SL), grains per spike (GPS), 1000-grain weight (TSW), grain yield (GY; t/ha), and biomass yield (BY; t/ha). Results To streamline the study, two years of aggregated data were analysed for each parameter. Drought tolerance was assessed based on grain yield, and multitrait genotype‒ideotype distance (MGIDI) indices were employed to select drought-tolerant wheat genotypes. Significant differences were observed among the wheat genotypes across all measured parameters under both conditions. Under normal conditions, correlation analysis revealed that grain yield (GY) and biomass yield (BY) had the strongest positive relationship (r = 0.75**), followed by TSW, LAI, GPS, SL, PH, DPM, and DA. In contrast, under water deficit stress, BY exhibited a notable correlation with plant height (PH) (r = 0.42). Under both irrigated and water
What's Your Reaction?
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-2187410260-5afe56694791404f99c253dd8d5abe6a.jpg?#)
